It appears Nintendo will no longer censor their first or third-party games, according to a recent shareholder Q&A session.
Just days ago, Nintendo’s 79th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders featured a Q&A session where their stance on censorship was highlighted. One question seemed to allude to Sony’s recent controversial censorship policies and queried Nintendo’s position on the issue. The questioner asked if Nintendo would censor games beyond the regulations of bodies such as the CERO.
Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa dismissed the concern by stating that Nintendo, and other third parties, apply for objective ratings from organizations like the CERO. Furukawa also pointed out that the Switch’s parental controls can already protect children from mature titles. However, that wasn’t the entirety of the President’s response.
In what has been interpreted as a thinly veiled critique of Sony, Furukawa stated that “platform-holding companies” would “inhibit” the industry if they “arbitrarily” chose what content should not be allowed in the market. He suggested that Nintendo’s goal is to protect expression in video games and censor as little as possible.
Q11. About content regulation.
On other platforms, there are cases of restrictions applied independently of CERO and other 3rd-party organizations.
What does Nintendo do? https://t.co/FaK0EWbFpO— Cheesemeister →🧵／🟦☁️ (@Cheesemeister3k) June 27, 2019
A11. Nintendo, as do 3rd-parties and their software, applies for an objective rating from 3rd-party organizations prior to release.
If platform-holding companies choose arbitrarily, the diversity and fairness in game software would be significantly inhibited. https://t.co/ZwKKcdh2kU— Cheesemeister →🧵／🟦☁️ (@Cheesemeister3k) June 27, 2019
The current censorship fiasco
Sony has recently come under fire for aggressively censoring many Japanese third-party games to “protect children.” One example, Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 Scarlet, has removed several items deemed too “lewd,” but only on PS4. Another noteworthy case is the extensively censored PS4 release of Omega Labyrinth Life. That title was forced to change its logo in order to remove shapes that resemble breasts.
According to Famitsu, the creator of the Senran Kagura franchise, Kenichiro Takaki, left developer Marvelous because of Sony’s regulations. Takaki felt that Sony’s policies were heavily restricting his series and that it could no longer flourish as a result.
Nintendo seems to be moving further away from censorship altogether in the last few years since the release of their hit Nintendo Switch console. Shuntaro Furukawa’s response will ease the mind of consumers and shareholders worried about the industry-wide implications of Sony’s policies.
Are you in favor of Nintendo’s stance on censorship, or do you believe censoring video games is vital for the protection of children? Share your thoughts below in the comments section.
I don’t like the idea of video game censorship. Like any form of art or media, the final product should be how a creator has intended it to be. If parents really cared for the protection of their children against “harmful media” they should either be more strict on the media that they allow there children to consume or push for companies to implement parental controls like that of Nintendo. Companies like Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft should not be pandering their products and services to children and instead aim for the older demographic because video game companies aren’t babysitters.
I agree it should be our. Job as parents to control. What I children watch and what. Games they play.